Edwards Exposes Berlanga's Money-Driven Fight Choices: Avoiding Plant, Targeting Munguia

Omar Yusuf

5 min read

Post on May 04, 2025

4.3

Share

The Liam Smith Controversy: A Missed Opportunity for Berlanga?

The potential matchup between Edgar Berlanga and Liam Smith presented a fascinating clash of styles and a significant test for the rising star. Smith, a former WBO super-welterweight champion, boasts a powerful punch and a proven ability to overcome adversity. A fight against Smith would have been a high-risk, high-reward proposition for Berlanga. While a victory would have catapulted Berlanga's status to a new level, a defeat would have been a significant setback.

The perceived risk was likely a major factor in Berlanga's decision to avoid this fight. Instead, he opted for a less challenging path, a choice that has drawn considerable criticism. Many fans and experts believe Berlanga is dodging tougher opponents to protect his undefeated record and maintain his marketability.

• Smith's recent high-profile wins and current ranking: Smith's impressive victories, including his stunning upset of Chris Eubank Jr., cemented his status as a top contender. This made a fight with Berlanga a highly anticipated event for boxing fans.
• The perceived "easier" path Berlanga chose instead: The alternative opponent offered less risk for Berlanga, ensuring a likely win and preserving his undefeated record, which is a key selling point for promoters.
• Fan and expert opinions on Berlanga dodging a tougher opponent: Social media and boxing forums exploded with debate, with many accusing Berlanga of lacking the courage to face a true test.
• The financial implications of choosing a less risky opponent: While a less risky fight might offer less prestige, it often comes with guaranteed purses and less risk of injury, which can impact future earning potential.

The Jaime Munguia Fight: A Strategic, but Potentially Unfulfilling, Choice

Berlanga's upcoming fight with Jaime Munguia is a prime example of a strategic, yet potentially unfulfilling, choice. Munguia, a former WBO junior middleweight champion, is a popular and marketable fighter with a strong following. This fight offers Berlanga a lucrative payday and increased exposure to a wider audience. However, it’s less of a test than the Liam Smith fight would have been. While Munguia possesses power and a relentless attack, many believe the fight is a calculated move to secure financial gains rather than prove his abilities against top-tier competition.

• Munguia's popularity and marketability: Munguia’s large fanbase and proven ability to draw viewers make him an attractive opponent from a financial standpoint.
• The financial incentives for Berlanga to fight Munguia: This fight likely represents a significantly larger payday than a fight with Smith, potentially outweighing the risk of a loss.
• Potential implications for Berlanga's career trajectory, win or lose: A win against Munguia might not elevate Berlanga's standing as much as a victory over Smith would have. A loss could severely damage his prospects.
• Comparison of the risk involved compared to a fight with Smith: The risk-reward ratio for the Munguia fight is significantly skewed towards reward, suggesting a prioritization of financial gain.

Demetrius Andrade's Accusations and their Impact

Demetrius Andrade, a former unified middleweight champion, openly criticized Berlanga's fight selection, accusing him of prioritizing money over competitive fights. Andrade's statement, given his experience and stature in the boxing world, carries significant weight.

• Andrade’s experience and perspective in the boxing world: Andrade’s own career provides a context for understanding the pressure to take challenging fights versus staying in the safer lane for financial gain.
• The potential impact of Andrade's accusations on Berlanga’s image: Andrade’s accusations have undoubtedly damaged Berlanga’s reputation among boxing fans who value competitive integrity.
• Whether Andrade's accusations are justified or simply sour grapes: While some dismiss Andrade's claims as jealousy, many believe his comments reflect the reality of the situation.

The Broader Issue of Money vs. Legacy in Boxing

The tension between financial gain and legacy-building is a constant theme in professional boxing. Many fighters face the difficult choice between taking lucrative but less challenging fights or risking their financial security for a shot at a truly significant achievement.

• Examples of boxers who prioritized legacy over money (and vice versa): The careers of fighters like Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr. offer contrasting examples of these different approaches.
• The influence of promoters and managers on fighter decisions: Promoters and managers often play a significant role in shaping a fighter's career trajectory.
• The long-term consequences of choosing lucrative but less challenging fights: While short-term financial gains might be attractive, a lack of competitive challenges can hinder a fighter's long-term legacy and prevent them from reaching their full potential.

Conclusion

Edgar Berlanga's recent fight choices have sparked considerable debate, with many critics like Demetrius Andrade pointing to a pattern of prioritizing financial gain over competitive challenges. While a fight against Jaime Munguia offers substantial financial rewards, the avoidance of a clash with Liam Smith raises questions about Berlanga's commitment to establishing a truly lasting legacy in the boxing world. Ultimately, Berlanga's decisions highlight the complex interplay between money and legacy in professional boxing, forcing fans to reconsider what constitutes true success in the sport. The question remains: will Berlanga's calculated approach to his career ultimately pay off, or will the avoidance of challenging fights ultimately define his legacy? To further explore this ongoing debate about Berlanga's fight choices and the broader implications for boxing, keep reading and sharing your thoughts!