Who Blinked First? Resolving The US-China Trade Standoff

Omar Yusuf

4 min read

Post on May 16, 2025

4.6

Share

Escalation and the Initial Salvos: The Trump Administration's Tariffs

The US-China trade war’s escalation began with the Trump administration's imposition of tariffs, a key element of its "trade protectionism" strategy. These tariffs, often justified under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, targeted a wide range of Chinese goods, aiming to address alleged unfair trade practices and intellectual property theft.

Imposition of Tariffs and their Rationale

The Trump administration implemented several rounds of tariffs, significantly impacting various sectors. These “Trump tariffs” were not uniformly applied; some focused on specific industries deemed crucial to China's economic growth.

• March 2018: Tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from several countries, including China.
• July 2018: 25% tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese goods, targeting technology and other sectors.
• September 2018 & Later: Further rounds of escalating tariffs covering hundreds of billions of dollars in Chinese goods.

The stated rationale behind these tariffs included:

• Addressing China's alleged intellectual property theft.
• Countering what the US considered unfair trade practices and subsidies.
• Reducing the US trade deficit with China.

China's Retaliatory Measures

China responded swiftly and aggressively to the Trump tariffs with its own retaliatory tariffs. These countermeasures mirrored the US actions, targeting key US agricultural products and manufactured goods. This “Chinese retaliation” significantly escalated the trade war, impacting both US businesses and consumers.

• Retaliatory tariffs on US agricultural products like soybeans and pork.
• Restrictions on the import of US technology and other goods.
• Disruptions to supply chains affecting various industries globally.

The escalating tit-for-tat tariffs created a volatile environment, fueling uncertainty in global markets and adding considerable costs to businesses on both sides.

Negotiations and the Search for a Resolution: The "Phase One" Deal and Beyond

Despite the initial escalation, both sides eventually recognized the need for negotiation. The "Phase One" trade deal, signed in January 2020, marked a significant turning point in the US-China trade standoff.

Key Players and Negotiation Strategies

Several key figures played pivotal roles in the negotiations. Robert Lighthizer, the US Trade Representative, led the US negotiating team, while Liu He, Vice Premier of the State Council of China, represented China. Their negotiation styles and strategies differed significantly, reflecting their respective political and economic priorities.

• Significant Events: Multiple rounds of high-level meetings, including those between Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping. Deadlines and threatened further escalation played crucial roles in the negotiation process.

Analyzing the Concessions

The "Phase One" deal involved substantial concessions from both sides. However, assessing which side made more significant concessions requires careful examination of economic and strategic implications.

• US Concessions: A partial rollback of tariffs on some Chinese goods.
• China Concessions: Significant commitments to increase purchases of US goods and services, improved intellectual property protections, and other structural reforms. These commitments, while substantial, were often subject to dispute over accurate measurements.

While both sides made concessions, arguments can be made for both sides representing the larger concession. The increased purchase commitments by China, for example, could be viewed as economically more substantial, while the US rollback on tariffs might be seen as strategically more significant in terms of de-escalation.

The Long-Term Implications: A Shifting Geopolitical Landscape

The US-China trade standoff had far-reaching consequences, impacting global trade and fundamentally altering the geopolitical landscape.

Impact on Global Trade

The trade war and its eventual resolution significantly disrupted global trade patterns and supply chains.

• Businesses shifted production away from China to avoid tariffs.
• Global supply chains became more fragmented and less efficient.
• Uncertainty discouraged investment and slowed economic growth worldwide.

Future of US-China Relations

The trade standoff significantly impacted the overall US-China relationship. While the “Phase One” deal offered a temporary reprieve, underlying tensions regarding technology, intellectual property, and geopolitical competition continue.

• Future trade relations remain uncertain, with potential for further conflicts.
• Areas of cooperation persist, particularly on issues of climate change and global health.
• The trade dispute highlighted the increasing geopolitical rivalry between the two nations.

Conclusion: Who Blinked First? Assessing the US-China Trade Standoff Resolution

The US-China trade standoff involved a complex interplay of tariffs, retaliatory measures, and negotiations. While both sides made concessions in the “Phase One” deal and subsequent agreements, determining who “blinked first” is ultimately a matter of interpretation and perspective. China's purchase commitments were economically significant, while the US tariff rollbacks held strategic weight. The long-term implications for global trade and US-China relations remain to be seen, indicating that the effects of this trade war are far from over. Stay informed about the evolving US-China trade relationship and its impact on global markets. Continue your research on the complexities of the US-China trade standoff to gain a more comprehensive understanding.